The beluga known as Jelly Bean’s offspring Bertie is an charming small “sweetheart”. The whale Orion – called “Onion” – is a large but guardian-like friend. Zephyr has “endless energy” and sways like a worm. Lillooet the beluga is the “loving presence” with a kind nature.
Thirty enclosed beluga whales in a Canada-based amusement park have become pawns in a tussle between a defunct facility, government authorities and welfare campaigners.
But those most familiar with the whales say the impassioned discussion over their destiny often fails to consider the nuances of the whales who, after living their entire lives in confinement, have been thoroughly researched by the caretakers who see them each day.
After the national authorities disallowed the export of the belugas to a foreign facility, the embattled facility near the famous falls where they are kept stated it would consider to euthanize them unless the government funds the upkeep of their care. The nation’s fisheries minister has refused that ultimatum, placing the thirty whales in an ever more uncertain situation.
Experts say that belugas’ neural makeup, along with their vocal imitation skills, cognitive challenges and social skills point to they are deeply intelligent mammals – something one caretaker discovered personally.
She spent a significant period as a marine mammal specialist, a job that required building relationships of the aquatic animals.
“Developing those bonds over time takes a lot of regularity and a lot of affection. At the outset, they’re very unsure of you,” she said. “In time, you gain shared confidence. And they start being more open with you. It’s just so extraordinary and rewarding.”
The trainer knew the whales were very smart, but she says she was even so surprised by the details and quirks in their characters. She cultivated a particular love for Eve and Cleopatra with different temperaments.
“Eve selected me. Cleo demanded work,” she said. “Both altered the way I understand connection.”
Her interaction with the whales developed against a background of increasing societal concern to their confinement.
During her three years at the facility, seven belugas and the park’s one orca, Kiska, died. In total, 19 belugas have died at the park since recent years, a statistic which the facility links to natural mortality, but which advocates say indicates the substandard environment in which they were housed.
The park did not admit visitors to the guests over the summer, but the former trainer says she saw with her own eyes results of the closure. “Concrete is falling apart from the enclosures because they’re degrading and not being fixed. The whales are exploratory and so they pick it up and move about with chunks in their jaws. It’s distressing to see.”
The park did not respond to a request for comment, but earlier claimed: “The whales … get far higher quality health care and constant care than any human in the UK, or anywhere else.”
Burgess was dismissed from the facility in recent months following the passing of a beluga, an sick beluga the employees had to humanely kill. She said the facility thought particulars of the death were shared to the news outlets and she was released soon after.
The lack of clarity over the whales’ outcome has left her and current and former trainers in distress. She says the facility’s ultimatum to euthanize its whales is a bargaining chip and is a “practically unfeasible” endeavor, adding any plans to euthanize even a one beluga would require “immense manpower”, vehicles and specialized tools.
“It cannot happen in hell the employees would ever do it,” she said.
Burgess advocates for requests for the whales to be removed right away from the facility, with its failing enclosures and dwindling staff.
In recent months, the nation’s fisheries minister denied a bid to export the whales to an overseas location.
“Granting the application would have meant a perpetual existence in confinement and a reversion to display for amusement,” the minister stated. “As the public, we know that marine mammals belong in the wild, not in tanks for our amusement. I could not in good conscience permit an relocation that would perpetuate the situation these belugas have endured.”
But Burgess said the official’s statements reveal a wider misunderstanding of the facts of existence for belugas living their whole lives in enclosures.
“The public needs to understand these are whales that have spent their whole lives in captivity and they will need human care for the remainder of their lives,” she said. “The public just don’t understand that it’s not as simple as saying ‘close it down’.”
As decision makers work to find a solution, proposals have emerged, some of which have minimal feasibility. An idea called for the belugas to be released into the wilds of the Arctic – where whales are a key source of nourishment for Indigenous peoples.
A suggested protected area in the region of eastern Canada, which now received government approval, has proven highly debated. The planned location, which includes a large area of protected cove, doesn’t yet exist. Advocates remain positive that it could eventually represent a long term solution for a number of the whales.
But, Burgess says, among trainers she’s spoken with, there is “skepticism there” about what she said is “simply an untested concept” in the whales’ well-being.
Others say the prospect of a refuge reflects a changing attitudes away from captive facilities and could represent a workable plan in the coming months.
Charles Vinick, director of the sanctuary project, said the site will simulate the mental engagement and feeding regimen the whales obtain from trainers, albeit in a more expansive space. He said after the health of whales is completely examined, which could take months|an extended period|
A seasoned financial analyst with over a decade of experience in UK investment markets, specializing in venture capital and portfolio management.